Supreme-ly FRAND: Supreme Court grant Tesla permission to appeal in its FRAND pool rate-setting dispute with Avanci and InterDigital โ€“ but beware the limitations.

Itโ€™s been a busy few weeks for SEP/FRAND cases in the UK.ย The Supreme Court is now going to hear its first SEP/FRAND case since ๐‘ˆ๐‘›๐‘ค๐‘–๐‘Ÿ๐‘’๐‘‘ ๐‘ƒ๐‘™๐‘Ž๐‘›๐‘’๐‘ก, granting Tesla permission to appeal in its dispute with Avanci and InterDigital concerning the UK courtโ€™s jurisdiction to make FRAND declarations in relation to a licensing pool (the Avanci 5G Platform).

The dispute started in December 2023, with Tesla commencing proceedings seeking, amongst other things, a declaration of FRAND terms for a licence of the UK SEPs in the Avanci 5G Platform or, alternatively, to the InterDigital UK SEPs within that pool.ย In other words, Tesla are seeking a determination of a FRAND licence ๐จ๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ฆ๐ฌ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐š ๐ฉ๐š๐ญ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐ฉ๐จ๐จ๐ฅ (the Avanci 5G Platform).

This differs from other SEP/FRAND disputes, which all concern bilateral licences between two parties.ย Related to this is that, as administrator of the pool, Avanci themselves do not own any of the SEPs in the pool.ย Tesla have pleaded that they have legal rights (the FRAND obligations owed by SEP holders under the ETSI IPR policy) against each of the individual members of the Avanci platform but have stopped short of pleading that they have legal rights enforceable against Avanci themselves.ย This has raised questions on whether the grant of a declaration (here, the terms of a FRAND licence) concerning a legal right requires the defendant (Avanci) to be the owner of or subject to the legal right relied on.

Following jurisdictional challenges, the High Court set aside (i.e. removed) Teslaโ€™s permission to serve its claim form on the US-based entities of InterDigital and Avanci.ย It is this jurisdictional challenge that is being appealed to the Supreme Court and so it is important to note the Supreme Court will ๐ง๐จ๐ญ be ruling on Teslaโ€™s arguments as such โ€“ only on whether they have a โ€˜real prospectโ€™ of succeeding with their case and so have permission to serve their claim form reinstated.ย ย If Tesla succeed on this, their pleaded case will be heard before the High Court.ย All eyes will then be on that case to see if Tesla succeed with their arguments concerning FRAND licensing terms in relation to patent pools.

Skip to content