Ean is a Partner in our Electronics & Software team, based in our Manchester office. He has a particular interest in telecoms, having spent the first few years in the profession working in-house for Nokia. He regularly handles subject matter ranging from RADAR systems, signal processing and digital systems to pipe couplings, medical devices and production equipment.
Ean jointly heads our Education sector team and works for a range of clients, including Universities (in the UK and abroad), global corporations and SMEs, operating in and around the Manchester area. He particularly enjoys working with up and coming companies, including spin-outs, helping them to identify and protect their intellectual property. He has experience of hearings before the UK and European Patent Office and frequently advises clients on contentious issues where their rights may be infringed or where they are accused of infringing the rights of others.
Before entering the patent profession, Ean spent several years working as a design engineer for Marconi and Motorola. This real-life commercial experience was invaluable and gives Ean an insight into some of the challenges faced by clients.
Ean was also mentioned in Managing Intellectual Property’s IP Stars guide in 2017 and described as a “problem solver” by a client.
It is important to mention first of all that there is no change to the application procedure at the European Patent Office. You will file an application at the EPO in the normal way, or will designate “EP” as usual in a PCT application.
There is no change at the filing stage and the application proceeds through search and examination at the EPO exactly the same as it does now. The new Unitary Patent simply gives an extra option which arises when the patent is granted by the EPO.
Currently, each European patent granted by the EPO must be validated in each of the member countries. This gives a ‘bundle’ of national patent rights which are then dealt with separately under the national laws of each country. Commentators often refer to these validations as ‘classical validations’.
The aim of the new Unitary Patent is to give a single patent with unitary effect across the entire European Union – that is, a true “European patent”.
In practice there have been some compromises, but the new system brings us a little closer to realising the goal.
The new UP will only cover some of the many countries in Europe. The exact list is still being decided.
Currently, a granted European patent can be validated in any desired combination of the thirty-eight (38) member states of the European Patent Convention. The new Unitary Patent will cover only a subset of the 38 EPC states, and applies only to EU countries that have signed up to the UPC Agreement. The system must have a minimum of 13 states, which must include United Kingdom, France and Germany, in order to begin. Currently 25 member states intend to ratify, which would be all EPC states except: Spain, Switzerland; Norway; Poland; Turkey; Albania; Croatia; Iceland; Liechtenstein; Monaco; Macedonia; Serbia; and San Marino.
The EU Patent package will enter into force in ratified countries four months after:
There is still uncertainty as to if and when the UK and Germany will ratify the agreement, the EU patent package will enter force and which countries it will cover. However, our best guess would be sometime between 2018 and 2020.
The new Unitary Patent gives an additional option upon grant of the patent by the EPO, which will exist alongside the traditional, classical validation option:
Just like we do at present, when the patent is granted by the EPO we have to think about which countries to keep alive and which to drop. Let’s first consider the non-EU countries such as Norway and Turkey where there is no change and, just like now, if you want those countries then you go through the national validation procedures with local translations etc.
Secondly we have the UPC countries when you have a choice – either pick and choose using the classical validation route separately in each country, or to use the new Unitary Patent to cover the whole UPC area at once. However, if the UK is an important territory, applicants should be cautious about a unitary patent validation before the impact of Brexit and the UK’s continued participation is confirmed.
The principle question concerns geographical coverage versus costs. The Unitary Patent, we expect, will cover 13+ countries for a reasonable cost, but that cost is fixed and applies the same for all patents. By contrast the traditional system allows you to choose a mix of countries that are appropriate to this particular patent and gives lifetime flexibility, in that over the lifetime of the patent some countries can be dropped whilst others are kept alive. Typically, as the patent ages then you will review the countries covered and remove those which are no longer of interest.
It is not yet possible to do a fully detailed cost comparison of the classical route against the new UP option, but initial calculations indicate that the break-even point for the UP will be equivalent to around four national validations. That is, if you were intending to validate the patent in United Kingdom, France, Germany and Netherlands then the costs are going to be roughly equivalent to using the UP route. The UP route then gives 13+ countries for pretty much the same cost – assuming that you are happy with the loss of flexibility and the inability to remove any countries or reduce costs later on.
The second issue, and this is again an important one, is that Unitary Patents will by default fall under the jurisdiction of the new Unified Patent Court. Here, you need to consider whether you want your patent to be litigated for infringement and for validity in the new UPC, or whether you want to retain instead the option of going to the traditional National Patent Courts separately in each state, which we will discuss on the next page.
When deciding whether the Unitary Patent is a good option, we will need to consider:
Based on the draft Rules (to be confirmed), a European patent obtains a unitary effect (UP validation) by filing a request. The request for UP must be made within 1-month of grant. No official fees are paid, but a full translation will be needed. If UP is allowed, you get a UP registration. The register will show the registration date and ratified states in which UP has effect. If UP is not requested or refused, the patent will proceed on the classical route as now with validation procedures due in individual states within 3-months.
The UP renewal provisions correspond to the provisions for pre-grant renewals at the EPO. UP renewals will therefore be payable up to 3-months early, at least 3-months from registration of UP, end-of-month payment, notification of missed payment, 6-month grace with extra fee, notification of loss-of-rights, and re-establishment.
The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.